Is Web 3.0 the future of the Internet?


Is Web 3.0 the future of the Internet?

Web3 is the newest buzzword  taking over the tech and venture capital world.  And if you've found yourself wondering what it means,  you're not alone.  

Web3 is seen as the third generation of the internet,  a decentralized online ecosystem based on the blockchain.  

Web3 represents kind of a new philosophy  about how to realize these technologies  in a more distributed and democratic way.  

Venture capitalists have invested billions  into this vision, but some tech experts are unconvinced  that Web3 could scale globally.  Skeptics like Tesla CEO, Elon Musk,  have called it a marketing buzzword.  

 A lot of the skepticism about web 3.0 comes from the fact  that it's early expressions are fairly primitive. 

As experts debate  whether or not this new version of the web  can become a reality,  here are some of the underlying principles  behind the vision for Web 3.0. 

To better understand Web 3.0  and what sets it apart from the web we use today,  you have to go back to the early days of the internet,  what experts now refer to as Web 1.0.  Most of the participants were content consumers  who were limited to navigating  through individual static web pages. 

Web 1.0, for those who remember,  was just, you know, raw HTML  and lots of very simple web pages,  and it wasn't really controlled by anybody. 

This was a more decentralized version  of the web, meaning anyone who knew how to code  could build on it from their own computers.  But at this time only a small number of users  had the technical skills to create and publish content.  

Then came Web 2.0,  which is the stage of the internet we're living through now.  Web technologies like JavaScript and HTML5  made the internet more interactive,  allowing startups to build platforms  like Facebook, Google, Amazon and many others.  For the first time, anyone could publish content online  even if they couldn't code. 

Web 2.0 is this modern, centralized verse of the web.  You know, we're all sharing things on social media  which are owned by, you know, only two or three companies,  and we're all using Google Search.  

These companies own and manage  the data collected from their users,  and they frequently track and save this data  and use it for targeted ads. 

What's at the core of their business model is data. 

Olga Mack is a blockchain lecturer  at UC Berkeley, and is optimistic about Web3's potential  to reshape the internet.  

The data economy, where the user generated content,  whether it's a conversation or a video,  that is an exchange for services.  And so there is a perception  that this monopoly of data could be abused.

 Here's where the vision for Web 3.0 comes in.  

The term Web3 was first coined by one of the creators  of the Ethereum blockchain, Gavin Wood.  In a 2014 blog post, Wood envisioned Web3 as an open  and decentralized version of the internet.  Theoretically, users would be able  to exchange money and information on the web  without the need for a middleman,  like a bank or a tech company. 

 In this vision for a Web3 world,  people would have more control over their data  and be able to sell it if they choose.  And it would all be operated  on a decentralized, distributed ledger technology.  The most common version of this is known as the blockchain. 

 While still considered relatively new and unproven,  it could offer more transparency and autonomy for users. 

The computers that are actually  doing that computing for you or storing that data,  anyone could own those computers,  anyone can become a part of that blockchain.  And so it's not Facebook and Google's computers doing that. 

With a single, personalized account,  users would theoretically be able to move seamlessly  from social media to email to shopping,  creating a public record on the blockchain  of all that activity. 

 But how exactly would Web3 remain operational  if it's not controlled by a central corporation or entity?  

Theoretically, people would be given virtual tokens,  or cryptocurrencies, to incentivize them  to participate in the operation of Web3.  A central element of the system  is so called DEFI, or decentralized finance. 

And the idea is that if you can issue a token  for everything in the universe,  if you can financialize every possible interaction  of computers and software and humans,  then you can create this vast ecosystem of cryptocurrencies  which can be traded,  which can be valued relative to one another.  

Still, it's unclear  how this decentralized token system would be regulated,  how it could operate on a large scale,  or even how well it would distribute  control of the internet.  

Critics of the idea like Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey,  called Web3 "a centralized entity with a different label." 

 Developers who really dug into this  think that the underlying blockchain structures of Web 3.0  are very insecure, not decentralized as promised,  they're actually as centralized as previous technologies.  

Some see Web 3.0 as a critical building block  IN creating the metaverse, an immersive online world  where people can use avatars  to socialize, shop, work, and play.  But others say Web3 and the metaverse  are two very different concepts. 

Because the Metaverse is being hyped a lot right now  and Web3 is,  there are some companies at the intersection of the two,  like let's create a metaverse  that, you know, somehow it's connected to the blockchain. 

Right now, Web3 is still very much  an abstract concept with little real-world foundation.  Skeptics, like engineer and blogger Stephen Diehl,  argue that web 3.0, doesn't have the computing power,  bandwidth, or storage to work on any practical level. 

For skeptics of Web3, 

their argument is that,  you know, tokens and cryptocurrencies in general  are just a giant bubble,  and as soon as it pops, in their view, all of this nonsense  about how that's going to build the next internet  will go away. 

While it remains to be seen  whether or not Web3 will become a reality,  the philosophy behind it is driving billions in investments  in the venture capital world,  funding a vast ecosystem of decentralized internet services. 

 So there's so much real-world money  going into building Web3 startups  that even if, as a concept, it proves unworkable,  we're gonna be hearing about it for a long time yet to come.   

Previous Post Next Post